International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media

Contact Information
For questions, please e-mail:


March 26-28, 2007

Tags are not metadata, but "just more content" - to some people

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Bettina Berendt and Christoph Hanser

The authoring of tags -- unlike the authoring of traditional metadata -- is highly popular among users. This harbours unprecedented opportunities for organizing content. However, tags are still poorly understood. What do they "mean", in what senses are they similar to or different from metadata? Different tags support different communities, but how exactly do they reflect the plurality of opinions,what is the relation to individual differences in authoring and reading? In this paper, we offer a definition and empirical evidence for the claim that "tags are not metadata, but just more content". The analysis rests on a multi-annotator classification of a blog corpus using the WordNet domain labels system (WND), the development of a system of text-classification methods using WordNet and WND, and a quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis of these classifications. We argue that the notion of a "gold standard" may be meaningless in social media, and we outline possible consequences for labelling and search-engine development.

Full Paper

Labels: ,

posted by ICWSM at 7:42 AM  


Anonymous said...

This paper was nominated for the ICWSM best paper award.

9:26 AM  
Laura said...

I think you're onto something here with a lot of implications. Following up on what I was trying to get at in my question about examining the long tail of author tags -- I was wondering how "just more content" can be split out. That is, intuitively, it seems that "just more content" wouldn't be only related to aboutness but also about to opinion, artistic creativity, and other categories. e.g., Sanjay's "insomnia due to quail wailing" Do you have any observations from the data?

11:25 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home