All Deadlines
Submission deadlines for ICWSM-2026
All deadlines 23:59 PM Anywhere on Earth
- 1st Full-paper Deadline: May 15, 2025 (New submissions, and R&Rs from Jan 2025 submissions)
[Notifications: July 15, 2025]
- 2nd Full-paper Deadline: September 15, 2025 (New submissions, and R&Rs from May 2025 submissions)
[Notifications: Nov 15, 2025]
- 3rd Full-paper Deadline: January 15, 2026 (New submissions, and R&Rs from September 2025 submissions)
[Notifications: March 15, 2026]
For May 15 2025, link for submission website
Submission deadlines before ICWSM-2025
All deadlines 23:59 PM Anywhere on Earth
1st Full-paper Deadline: May 15, 2024 (New submissions, and R&Rs from Jan 2024 submissions)
[Notifications: July 15, 2024]
2nd Full-paper Deadline: September 15, 2024 (New submissions, and R&Rs from May 2024 submissions)
[Notifications: Nov 15, 2024]
3rd Full-paper Deadline: January 15, 2025 (New submissions, and R&Rs from September 2024 submissions)
[Notifications: March 15, 2025]
Demos Deadline: January 15, 2025 [Notifications: March 15, 2025]
Poster Deadline: January 15, 2025 [Notifications: March 15, 2025]
Dataset Deadline: January 15, 2025 [Notifications: March 15, 2025]
Tutorial Deadline: January 15, 2025 [Notifications: March 15, 2025]
Workshop Deadline: January 24, 2025 11:59 PM Anywhere on Earth [Notifications: Mon February 3rd,
2025]
Submission guidelines specific to Demos, Poster, Dataset, Tutorial and Workshop will be updated closer to that
deadline.
Brief Full Paper Submission Information
Full Paper Submission Site (new submissions)
Full Paper Submission Site (for papers that received
revise and resubmit decision in September 2024 round)
- Register or log in to PCS account to access the above link
- After registering/logging in, click on the Submissions tab and make the following selections from the dropdown
menus: Society: AAAI. Conference/Journal: ICWSM 25. Track: ICWSM 25 January Submissions.
- After clicking "Go" a placeholder submission will appear in the table below. Click on "Edit Submission" to add
your paper details.
- The submission will be marked complete when you have entered all the required fields, but you will still be
able to make edits until submissions are closed.
The 2025 reviewing process will be similar to that of the 2024 process. The new, required Paper
Checklist section introduced in 2024 will be continued this year and all papers accepted to ICWSM-2025 will
be required to have this section. Papers to be considered for publication in the ICWSM proceedings, and
presentation at the ICWSM-2025 conference, must be submitted by one of the remaining submission deadlines listed
above. See also the Paper Checklist as
PDF here.
Authors who receive the
"Accept" recommendation will have the opportunity to respond to reviewer suggestions by making minor edits when
preparing the camera-ready version. Authors who receive the "Revise and Resubmit" recommendation will have the
opportunity to address reviewer suggestions and resubmit an improved manuscript in the next submission deadline.
Papers accepted no later than March 2025, will be presented at the ICWSM-2025 conference and will be published in
the corresponding conference proceedings. Authors who receive "Revise and Resubmit" in March 2025 will likely be
presenting during the 2026 conference if their papers get accepted during the next submission round in May 2025.
See the complete submission guidelines below for more information.
Full Formatting Guidelines for Paper Submission
Content Guidelines
Format
: All papers must be submitted as high-resolution PDF files, formatted in AAAI two-column,
camera-ready style, for US Letter (8.5" x 11") paper, using Type 1 or TrueType fonts (available templates:
AAAI 2025 Author Kit on Overleaf or
AAAI 2025 Author Kit.zip [Word | LaTeX]).
. Full papers are recommended to be 8 pages long, and must be at most 11 pages long, including only the
main text and the references. The mandatory
Ethics Checklist (and brief additional Ethics Statement, if desired, see below), optional appendices, etc. do
not count toward the page limit and should be placed after
the references. Appendices, if they exist, should be placed after the Ethics Checklist. Revision papers and
final camera-ready full papers can be up to 12 pages, not including the Ethics Checklist and optional appendices.
Note that reviewers are not bound to review appendices, and excessively long appendices can be a ground for
rejection.
No
source files (Word or LaTeX) are required at the time of submission for review; only the PDF file is permitted.
Finally, the copyright slug may be omitted in the initial submission phase, and no copyright form is required
until a paper is accepted for publication.
Language
: All submission must be in English.
Anonymity
: ICWSM-2025 review is double-blind. Therefore, please anonymize your submission: do not put the
author names or affiliations at the start of the paper, and do not include funding or other acknowledgments in
papers submitted for review. References to authors' own prior relevant work should be included, but should not
specify that this is the authors' own work. It is up to the authors' discretion how much to further modify the
body of the paper to preserve anonymity. The requirement for anonymity does not extend outside of the review
process, e.g. the authors can decide how widely to distribute their papers on the Web. Even in cases where the
author's identity is known to a reviewer, the double-blind process will serve as a symbolic reminder of the
importance of evaluating the submitted work on its own merits without regard to authors' reputation. Note that
2-page demo submissions and the dataset paper submissions, and only these, are exempt from the anonymization
requirement as they often contain system URLs or URLs to data sharing services.
Revisions
: Papers that were previously submitted to ICWSM and received a "Revise and Resubmit " decision
should be accompanied by a copy of the previous reviews and an author response statement. The response statement
may be in any format, but many reviewers appreciate a response that begins with an overall summary and then
includes a table, with each row containing a reviewer comment in the left cell, and author's response in the
right cell. The response cell may explain why no changes were made, or may describe changes and direct the
reviewer to a particular page, section, or figure, where the revised content appears. At the discretion of the
Senior PC member handling the paper, the revised version may be sent back to some or all of the original
reviewers for comment and evaluation, and may also be sent to additional reviewers.
REQUIRED Ethics Guidelines: In order to
provide a balanced perspective, authors are required to include a new checklist that describes the potential broader impact of
their work and ethical considerations. Drawing on feedback from the 2023 ICWSM Town Hall and approaches used in
other conferences, the 2024 ICWSM Program Committee Chairs have developed this checklist-based approach for the
Ethics section of ICWSM papers submitted for the cycle 2023-2024 and 2024-2025. All papers should
communicate the known or anticipated consequences of research via the paper checklist available as an
Overleaf document
, and a
PDF format
. This completed and unaltered (i.e. no questions removed) checklist should come as the first section
after the references of the paper.
Authors may supplement this Paper Checklist (in the same section of the paper) with a brief discussion that
expands on answers to the checklist where it is necessary to do so. Note that this section does not count towards
the page limit,
and that papers without such a statement will be desk-rejected.
Disclosure of funding and competing interests:
Authors are required to provide an explicit disclosure of funding (financial activities
supporting the submitted work) and competing interests (related financial activities outside the submitted
work)
that could result in conflicts of interest, in a section (e.g., "Acknowledgments") that should be added to
the
camera-ready version of accepted papers, but not in the version submitted for review (in order to maintain
author anonymity). Furthermore, authors are required to read the
AAAI code of conduct and ethics guidelines
; submitting to ICWSM implies that the authors agree to abide by these rules.
Resubmission:
Authors will need to declare if a previous version of their submission was rejected at
any
peer-reviewed venue, and, if so, summarize the changes made in the current version and include the original
review. Authors of rejected papers from ICWSM may revise and submit their revised papers after 6 months of
the
date of the last decision, but not before. For example, papers submitted in the January round can be
resubmitted
to the September round (6 months after the decision in March) but not the May round. This decision was made
to
avoid paper rejections due to lack of time for revisions and to discourage authors from submitting papers
that
are not ready.
Note that this limit only applies to rejected full papers, and not to rejected
demo, poster, or dataset papers.
Policy on Authorship:
ICWSM'25 will adopt the following subsection of ACM's new
policy
on authorship, restated here: Generative AI tools and technologies, such as ChatGPT, may not be listed
as
authors of an ACM published Work. The use of
generative AI tools and technologies to create content is permitted but must be fully disclosed in the Work.
For
example, the authors could include the following statement in the Acknowledgements section of the Work:
ChatGPT
was
utilized to generate sections of this Work, including text, tables, graphs, code, data, citations, etc. If
you
are
uncertain about the need to disclose the use of a particular tool, err on the side of caution, and include a
disclosure
in the Acknowledgements section of the Work.
Basic word processing systems that recommend and insert replacement text, perform spelling or grammar checks
and
corrections, or systems that do language translations are to be considered exceptions to this disclosure
requirement and
are generally permitted and need not be disclosed in the Work.
Duplicate Submissions: ICWSM-2025 will not accept any paper that, at the time of
submission, is under review for or has already been published or accepted for publication in a journal or
conference. This restriction does not apply to submissions for non-archival workshops.
While we will not accept previously published papers, papers submitted as social sciences and
sociophysics (not for publication) may be under review concurrently at a journal. If duplicate submissions
are
identified during the review process then:
-
All submissions from that author will be disqualified from the current ICWSM conference
-
And authors will not be permitted to submit papers to the ICWSM conference in the following year.
Conference Registration: Authors will be contacted about how to register for the
conference. General registration for this year's conference will open soon. Stay tuned!
Publication: All accepted papers and extended abstracts will be published in the
conference proceedings, except for those submitted to the 'social sciences and sociophysics (not for
publication)'; only abstracts will be published for those. Though initial submissions of full papers
must
not exceed 11 pages, full papers accepted for publication will be allocated up to twelve (12) pages in the
conference proceedings to facilitate authors in addressing comments raised by the reviewers. Authors will be
required to transfer copyright to AAAI.
Datasets: ICWSM provides a service for hosting datasets pertaining to research
presented
at the conference. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to share the datasets on which their papers
are
based, while adhering to the terms and conditions of the data provider. Of these datasets, one will be
selected
for an award which will be based on the quality, scope, and timeliness of each dataset. More information
will be
available on our website.
Submission Information
Posters, Demos, and Datasets Site
- Register or log in to PCS
account to access
the above link
- After registering/logging in, click on the Submissions tab, and make the following selections from the
dropdown menus:
Society: AAAI. Conference/Journal: ICWSM 25. Track: ICWSM 25 Posters, Demos, and Datasets.
- After clicking "Go" a placeholder submission will appear in the table below. Click on "Edit Submission" to add
your paper details.
- The submission will be marked complete when you have entered all the required fields, but you will still be
able to edit it until submissions are closed.
Posters and Demos
Poster papers must be no longer than 5 pages (excluding the mandatory ethics checklist and optional appendices),
with page 5 containing
nothing but references. Demo descriptions must be no longer than 3 pages (excluding the mandatory ethics
checklist and optional appendices), with page 3 containing nothing but references. Note that reviewers are not
bound to review appendices, and excessively long appendices
can be a ground for rejection. Both types of submissions must
follow the same
formatting guidelines as full papers, in particular using a 2-column format. The submission deadline for both
posters and demos is January 15, 2025.
The reviewing process for posters and demos will follow the same pattern as in previous years. Submissions will
either be accepted or rejected. Authors of accepted submissions will be able to respond to reviewer suggestions by
making minor edits when preparing the camera-ready version. Poster and demo papers will not have a revise and
resubmit phase. Poster submissions are double-blind, while demo submissions are single-blind, and require the
Ethics Checklist described in the guidelines.
Datasets
Dataset paper submissions must be between 2-10 pages long, including references but excluding the mandatory
"Ethics Checklist" section, and will be part of the full proceedings. Submissions will either be accepted or
rejected without an option to revise and resubmit. Authors of accepted submissions will have the opportunity to
respond to reviewer suggestions by making minor edits when preparing the camera-ready version. All papers must
follow the AAAI formatting guidelines. Please refer to the guidelines for submission. We
also encourage authors to
submit a small sample of the dataset (maximum of 10MB, in csv, txt, json, or other readable formats) to aid the
reviewers. This should be submitted as supplementary material on the Precision Conference system.
The submissions must comprise (i) a dataset or group of datasets, and (ii) a paper describing the content,
quality, structure, potential uses of the dataset(s), as well as the methodology employed for data collection.
Furthermore, descriptive statistics may be included in the metadata; however, more sophisticated analyses should
be included in regular paper submissions. The review will be single-blind, and all datasets must be identified and
uploaded at the time of submission.
Datasets and metadata must be published using a dataset-sharing service (e.g. Zenodo, datorium, dataverse, or any other dataset-sharing service that indexes
your dataset and metadata and increase the re-findability of the data) that provides a DOI for the dataset, which
must be included in the dataset paper submission.
Authors are encouraged to:
- Include a description of how they intend to make their datasets FAIR.
- Consider addressing the questions covered in the Datasheets for Datasets
recommendations.
Page Limits
- Dataset Paper (2 to 10 pages, including references, excluding paper checklist)
- Poster Paper (up to 5 pages including references, excluding paper checklist)
- Demo Paper (up to 3 pages including references, excluding paper checklist)
Deadline: Friday January 24th, 2025 11:59 PM Anywhere on Earth
Notifications: Mon February 3rd, 2025
The ICWSM-2025 Committee invites proposals for Workshops Day at the 19th International AAAI
Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM-2025). The Workshops Day will be held on June 23rd, 2025. Workshop
participants will have the opportunity to meet and discuss issues with a selected focus -- providing an informal
setting for active exchange among researchers and developers from a wide range of disciplines, including social
science and computer science. Workshops are an excellent forum for exploring emerging approaches and task areas,
bridging gaps between the social sciences and computing, and elucidating the results of exploratory
research.
Members of the social media research community are encouraged to submit proposals. To foster
interaction and exchange of ideas, the workshops will be kept small, with up to 40 participants.
The format of workshops will be determined by their organizers. The two main criteria for the
selection of the workshops will be the following:
- The organizers encourage workshops that promote different types of activities, including
challenges, games, brainstorming, and networking sessions. The organizers discourage workshops that are
structured as mini-conferences dominated by long talks and short discussions. Workshops should leave ample
time for discussions and interaction between the participants and should also encourage the submission and
presentation of position papers that discuss new research ideas.
- The workshop should have the potential to attract the interest of researchers in computer
science and social science. Proposals involving people of different backgrounds in the organizing committee
and addressing topics at the intersection of different disciplines will have a higher chance of
acceptance.
Workshop organizers who want to publish the papers from their workshop (or significant portions
of it) will have the opportunity to do so through workshop proceedings by the AAAI Press. For a list of last
year's workshops see here.
Workshop Proposal Contents
Proposals for workshops should be no more than five (5) pages in length (10pt, single column,
with reasonable margins), written in English, and should contain the following:
- A concise title.
- The names, affiliations, and contact information of the organizing committee. A main contact
author should be specified.
- An indication as to whether the workshop should be considered for a half-day or full-day
meeting.
- A short abstract describing the scope and main objective of the workshop. Identify the
specific issues and research questions the workshop will focus on, with a brief discussion of why the topic is
of particular interest at this time and for which research communities.
- A two/three paragraph description of the workshop topic and themes.
- A description of the proposed workshop format and a detailed list of proposed activities,
with special emphasis on those activities that distinguish it from a mini-conference (e.g., games,
brainstorming sessions, challenges, group activities).
- An approximate timeline of the activities.
- A description of how workshop submissions will be evaluated and selected (invited
contributions, peer review: single/double blind, etc.). In case a PC is needed, provide a tentative list of
the members.
- Historical information about the workshop, if available. Short description of the previous
editions reporting highlights and details about the approximate number of attendees and number of
submissions.
- A list of other related workshops held previously at related conferences, if any (list does
not have to be exhaustive), together with a brief statement on how the proposed workshop differs from or how
it follows-up on work presented at previous workshops.
- A short bio for each member of the organizing committee, including a description of their
relevant expertise. Strong proposals include organizers who bring differing perspectives to the workshop topic
and who are actively connected to the communities of potential participants.
- A brief statement on whether any generative AI tools were used to generate ideas for the
workshop or the workshop activities. Workshop organizers strongly discourage the use of generative AI to come
up with workshop ideas and activities.
Your proposal should be emailed in a single file to the workshop chairs
(Luca Rossi, Shruti Phadke, and Akhil Arora) at workshops@icwsm.org before the deadline. For additional information
please contact the workshop chairs at the same address.
ICWSM-2025 invites proposals for Tutorials Day at the 19th International AAAI Conference on Web
and Social Media (ICWSM). ICWSM-2025 is seeking proposals for tutorials on topics related to the computational
analysis and understanding of social phenomena in the following formats:
Lecture-style:
Traditional tutorials to teach concepts, methodologies, tools, and software packages. Tutorials
on novel and fast growing directions and significant applications are highly encouraged. The conference is
paying particular attention to themes around new perspectives in social theories, as well as computational
algorithms for analyzing new forms of social media. Lecture-style tutorials on these themes are highly
encouraged.
Hands-on:
Interactive, in-depth, hands-on training on cutting edge systems and tools (with a proven track
record in the community), targeted at novice as well as moderately skilled users, with a focus on providing an
engaging experience. The pace of the tutorial should be set such that beginners can follow along
comfortably.
Translation:
Tutorials that aim to translate concepts between disciplines. For example, such a tutorial could
introduce social science concepts to computer scientists, or computational concepts to social scientists. Thus,
these tutorials should be geared towards a beginner audience.
Case study:
Focused tutorials that emphasize real world applications of ICWSM work. These tutorials should
walk the audience through how research insights and tools were applied in practice. We welcome submissions from
practitioners in industry, government, and NGOs in addition to academics.
Free-style:
We also welcome proposals for creative and unconventional training sessions, such as hackathons,
competitions/challenges, etc., as long as participants can learn practical skills and participate in an active
way.
We welcome tutorials of various lengths (1, 2, 4, or up to 8 hours). We are looking for
contributions from experts in both the social and computational sciences, in industry, academia, and beyond. For
a list of tutorials from previous years, we encourage you to visit the tutorials page for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024. We especially
encourage applications from first-time proposers and scholars with research communities beyond ICWSM.
Acceptance Criteria
The format will be entirely determined by the tutorial organizers—i.e., you! Proposals will be
selected for inclusion considering the following criteria:
- Relevance, interest, and value of the topic to ICWSM attendees and research
communities.
- Cross-pollination potential. Tutorials that attract an interdisciplinary audience will be
given preference. The proposals should highlight, when applicable, the tutorial's potential to transfer
knowledge from one discipline/area to another.
- Interactivity. We will favor tutorials that aim to include hands-on experiences,
collaborative approaches, and interactivity.
- Completeness, clarity, and quality of the proposal and materials, including the schedule of
the tutorial.
- Expertise of the presenters.
Proposals of tutorials presented at past events are allowed, although novelty is a plus. The
tutorial chairs may also reach out to potential tutorial presenters about a change in format length depending on
expected increased interest or capacity constraints.
Tutorial Proposal Content and Format
Proposals for tutorials should be no more than three (3) pages in length. Proposal submissions
should include the following information:
- Title. A concise title.
- Abstract. A short description (200 words) of the main objective of the tutorial, to be
published on the main ICWSM website.
- Type. The type of tutorial you are proposing: lecture-style, hands-on, translation,
case study, or free-style.
- Names, affiliations, emails, and personal websites of the tutorial organizers. A main
contact author should be specified. A typical proposal should include no more than three presenters (more
people can be involved in the organization).
- Duration. A short timeline description of how you plan to break down the material over
the proposed duration (1, 2, 4, or 8 hours). Please mention here the proposed duration, but keep in mind that
the Tutorial Chairs might conditionally accept a proposal and suggest a different duration to best fit the
organization of the whole event.
- Tutorial schedule and activities. A description of the proposed tutorial format, a
schedule of the proposed activities (e.g., presentations, interactive sessions) along with a *detailed*
description for each of them.
- Target audience, prerequisites and outcomes. A description of the target audience, the
prerequisite skill set for the attendee (if any) as well as a brief list of goals for the tutors to accomplish
by the end of the tutorial.
- Materials. The organizers of accepted tutorials will be required to set up a web page
containing all the information for the tutorial attendees before the tutorial day (roughly 2 weeks before the
tutorial day). The proposal should contain the list of materials that will be made available on the
website.
- Past precedent (when available). A list of other tutorials held previously at related
conferences, if any, together with a brief statement on how the proposed tutorial relates to previous events.
If the authors of the proposal have organized other tutorials in the past, pointers to the relevant material
(e.g., slides, videos, web pages, code) should be provided.
Additional info for hands-on tutorials:
- Operating system and required installed tools on attendees' devices.
- List of software licenses required for the tools.
- Setup instructions for attendees. (The setup should not take more than 1 hour to
complete.)
Please use the AAAI 2025 Author Kit on Overleaf or AAAI 2025 Author Kit.zip [Word | LaTeX] to format your submission. Your proposal should be
emailed in a single file to the tutorial chairs (Tunazzina Islam, Pablo Aragón, and Shadi Rezapour) at tutorials@icwsm.org before the deadline. For additional
information please contact the tutorial chairs at the same address.
ICWSM 2025 will offer a new and experimental mentoring scheme for
first-time ICWSM authors. Interested authors can submit a complete
manuscript by August 1, 2024, 23:59 AoE. Qualifying manuscripts will
receive written feedback from a Senior PC member by August 22 on how their
manuscript can be improved. We hope that authors can incorporate the
feedback and submit an improved manuscript in the
regular ICWSM
submission cycle
by September 15, 2024.
This scheme's goal is to support young scholars, in particular in
low-and-middle-income countries, and to increase ICWSM's appeal to
scholars in adjacent communities.
Before submitting your manuscript via a
web
form, you will need to confirm that:
-
None of the authors has any prior ICWSM full papers, not counting
poster, dataset or workshop papers.
-
Your manuscript is complete (typically 7-11 pages in a two-column
format) without any missing sections.
-
You are available to substantially revise your paper between August 22
and September 15.
-
The manuscript presents academic research related to "the Web and social
media", broadly defined.
We also ask you to check whether the first author's affiliation country
qualifies as a low, lower-middle, or upper-middle income economy according
to the
World Bank classification. Authors from these countries will be given priority if mentoring
demand
exceeds mentoring capacity.
Similarly, in the submission form, we ask about prior experience with
non-full-paper publications, e.g. dataset, poster or workshop
publications, and about prior ICWSM attendance. Authors without any ICWSM
experience will be given priority if mentoring demand exceeds mentoring
capacity.
While not required, we suggest you follow the
formatting
guidelines
for ICWSM 2024 to save the time needed later for reformatting. However,
please include the author and affiliation information in the manuscript
for the mentoring scheme.
Disclaimers:
-
We have limited capacity and cannot guarantee that your manuscript will
receive mentoring.
-
Successful participation in the mentoring scheme does not guarantee your
paper will be accepted for publication at ICWSM 2025. In particular, the
paper, if submitted by Sep 15, 2024, will be handled by a different SPC
member, who will not be informed of the paper's mentoring history.
To participate please submit your document using this
web form
no later than Aug 1, 2024, 23:59
Anywhere on Earth.
ICWSM Adamic-Glance Distinguished Early Career Award
This annual award is presented to an early career researcher who has distinguished themself through innovative
scholarship in the area of social computing/computational social science in the early stage of their independent
research career. The award is named after Lada Adamic and Natalie Glance, two outstanding researchers who have made significant contributions to the
International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM) in particular and social computing/computational
social science in general. The ICWSM research community at large has greatly advanced this field, through
identifying the connections between online digital behaviors and critical societal questions and issues. From
credibility and trust of online content to how we can use social media and social networks to gain insight into
political
polarization, mental health, and social movements, the range of topics addressed by the community is continuously
expanding. ICWSM is also the home of technological achievements such as GEPHI and VADER. We want to recognize and
celebrate the early career researchers who are making these contributions
today.
The award was established in 2021, at the 15th anniversary mark of the AAAI ICWSM conference. Prior winners of the award
are Dr. Tanu Mitra (2021), Dr. Robert West (2022), Dr. Diyi Yang (2023), and Dr. Kiran Garimella (2024).
Nomination Process and Eligibility
Self-nominations, nominations, and letters of support are elicited. ICWSM strongly encourages individuals from
underrepresented groups in research (based on gender identity, race, ethnicity, geographical location, etc.) to
self-nominate, and urges the wide community to nominate early career researchers who have distinguished themselves
for their creativity and rigor in identifying and addressing important research topics of societal impact.
Nominations are open all year long, but those received by March 15th, 2025 will be considered for this year's
award. Use this Google Form for submission.
ICWSM does not preclude people from nominations year on year, in fact we welcome it as long as the applicant
still qualifies. We do not take prior nominations into account and believe that it is entirely plausible that
early career individuals can provide more competitive applications in subsequent years.
New in 2025: Starting in 2025, the committee will contact all nominated individuals and suggest
that they submit a two-page narrative of their research contributions. This is extremely valuable to the
committee, so that it can better compare self-nominated researchers with the ones nominated by colleagues or
mentors. The committee will also limit the total number of letters of support that it will consider to three.
Eligibility Criteria
The award is open to individuals who:
- Have received their PhD within the past 10 years. Career interruptions and other special circumstances will be
considered and should be mentioned in the nomination justification document.
- Perform research that is recognizably within the broad field of social computing/computational social science
in terms of their thematic and methodological approaches.
- Have published their research in the top venues for social computing or computational social science,
including publications and active participation in ICWSM through community service.
As long as a candidate is eligible based on the three criteria above, they will be considered even if they were
nominated or self-nominated in prior years.
Selection Process
The selection committee consists of three to five members and is appointed by the AAAI ICWSM Steering Committee
Chair. The committee solicits self-nominations, nominations, and letters of support from the social
computing/computational social science community. The selection is based on the impact of the candidate's work in
the field: in identifying significant new problems, creating promising new ideas, paradigms, and tools related to
data-driven understanding of human behavior, which may be quantitative or qualitative in nature. Depth and impact
are valued over breadth of contribution for this award. A strong regard for considering the ethical aspects of the
data/methods used in social computing/computational social science is expected of the research record of the
nominees.
The nomination form asks the following
questions:
- Nominator's information (name, affiliation, email, a link to their webpage).
- Nominee's information (name, affiliation, email, year of PhD, a link to their webpage that contains additional
information, for example their CV/resume).
- A statement (no longer than two pages) explaining why the nominee deserves the award in question, especially
highlighting the novelty and strength of their contributions in the area of computational social science /
social computing, and providing evidence of their academic and societal impact. A second page can be included to
contain information about career interruption or any special considerations.
- Citations for up to three representative publications and/or links to other artefacts documenting the
contribution or impact.
Note for letters of support: The form makes it easy to submit letters of support from people other than
the nominators or self-nominators. Such individuals will not need to complete the details of the nomination, they
will simply upload their letter.
Form accessibility: The nomination form requires Google authentication. If for any reason this is a
problem for the nominator, please send the nomination materials via email to: adamic-glance-award@icwsm.org.
Conflict of interest: The awards committee takes conflict of interest seriously. If an nominated
individual is a former or current collaborator of one or more of the committee members, such member(s) recuse
themselves from evaluating and voting on these nominations.
2025 Awards Committee
- Bernie Hogan (University of Oxford)
- Diyi Yang (Stanford University)
- Robert West (EPFL)
- Tanu Mitra (University of Washington)
Award recipients will be joining the award selection committee within two years of their award win, to replace
members who rotate off the committee.
Contact the committee: adamic-glance-award@icwsm.org
Award Ceremony
The award will be presented annually during the AAAI ICWSM conference. The awardee will be given the opportunity
to give a plenary talk at the next year conference and announce the new recipient. Each recipient will be listed
with a citation for their award on the ICWSM Adamic-Glance Distinguished Early Career Award web page. Financial
support for attending the conference will be provided.
(ICWSM-2025 PC Chairs | pc.chairs@icwsm.org)
datasets@icwsm.org
workshops@icwsm.org
tutorials@icwsm.org
2025@icwsm.org